Debate on the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) appointment of a successor

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Abul Hasan al-Refaa, a Shia, said to Ibn Raameen, a jurist and a stanch opponent of the Shias –

When the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) came out from Medina (for the Battle of Tabuk), he did not appoint anyone.

Ibn Raameen replied – No. He appointed Ali (a.s.).

Al-Refaa retorted – How come? Why didn’t he just say to the people of Medina that you choose/elect (your ruler) because you will not gather upon a deviation?

Ibn Raameen said – Because he (s.a.w.a.) feared that (if they do this), they will be entangled in discord and mischief.

Al-Refaa: Had mischief and corruption occurred, he (s.a.w.a.) would have rectified it on his return (to Medina).

Ibn Raameen: This is better (that he appoints a successor instead of waiting for mischief and corruption to occur then rectify it).

Al-Refaa: Did he (s.a.w.a.) appoint anyone after his death?

Ibn Raameen: No

Al-Refaa: His (s.a.w.a.) departure from this world is greater than his journeys. How he (s.a.w.a.) felt safe about his nation after his death, what he (s.a.w.a.) feared for them during his journey and while he (s.a.w.a.) was still alive?

Ibn Raameen had no answer.

  • Behaar al-Anwaar vol. 23 p. 75 after tradition 24